Chunk White's Mondo Complexo

Learn to love the gray. CWMC is a spot for those tired of the "with us or against us" culture in which we live. Join me in search of the beauty of real complexity, and check the black and white hats at the door.

Monday, July 04, 2011

"I Lost on Jeopardy, Baby."

The room was unnaturally cold, and way too bright. Not to mention that I felt like one of those old movie stars, like Bogart or Cagney, who had to wear platform shoes to be as tall as their leading ladies; I was standing on a riser that boosted me off the ground at least half a foot. Not that, since I’m 5’ 4”, I wasn’t grateful for the compensatory lift, but it did strike me as unfair that in the land of equality, height disparities were not permitted. I was standing in front of an audience of around two hundred people. There were school groups, youngsters of modest means dressed in the same brightly colored shirts that would fall apart after one wash. There were the tourists, happy for the air conditioning, raffled prizes and free admission. And of course, the suspiciously idle elderly. There I stood, on my precarious perch, chatting about my inappropriately large collection of LP’s with none other than our most beloved and trusted game show host, Alex Trebek. I had made it on to Jeopardy!, and while I was ecstatic to be there, what I will always carry most about that moment was that I was truly there. No nerves, no fear, no anticipation; just a chubby, jovial New Yorker and a snowy-haired Canadian discussing their mutual love of vinyl in front of an estimated TV audience of eleven million people. I must admit that I was, at the same time, trying to remember the capital of Laos, in case it came up in the Daily Double.

It was a long and bumpy road to those lofty heights, some six inches off the ground. When I was seven, my class went on a tour of NBC Studios, and got to watch a taping of the original Jeopardy! (I’m not certain if everyone in my group was wearing the same t-shirt that day). That was the Jeopardy! of Art Fleming and Don Pardo, of flip pads and Final Jeopardy answers scribbled in magic marker, of those conical Dixie Cups of water, years’ supplies of Turtle Wax and of Rice-a-Roni, the San Francisco treat. I was hooked, and being able to remember most everything useless, I was on my way. Cross-dissolve to early February, when my office phone rang and the number that flashed on the Caller ID was from a Southern California area code. I had made it. The month that ensued was one of ceaseless practice, and of endless advice from my friends on how to study and to prepare my thumbs for the buzzer, for that is truly where the game is won or lost, it is said. What to do? Study what I already knew well to master it, or try to cram everything I could into my rapidly aging brain in the month I had? As the day approached, I got more and more anxious; the night before we left for LA, Maria called, Leia to my Luke. She sensed my anxiety instantly, and said, “Listen—it comes down to one thing. Be there. Be in the moment. Enjoy it, and be present for it, ‘cause it ain’t coming again.” It was then that I realized that I had become so wrapped up in what might or might not happen that I had lost sight of the chance I had to do something I’ve wanted to do since Nixon was president.

Did I succeed? The flight out was a nightmare, like the night before the SAT, sure that if I stopped studying, the next thing I would have studied had I not closed the book would definitely have shown up as a question. Dinner and our stay at the fabulous Marriott Century City was a blur. They taped five shows that day, and by luck of the draw, I went last. I had to spend all day, sweating it out, sure that after they’d asked such an easy Final Jeopardy question that mine would be the hardest in the history of the show. And afterwards, when I did not win but acquitted myself with some distinction, I was a complete wreck. It had taken everything I had to hold myself together, and that release combined with the disappointment of not winning reduced me to a puddle. We flew the redeye home; I bustled Susan into a cab, and headed out to work, thus setting a domestic distance record for longest morning commute.

But here’s the thing; for all the drama and stress before and after, for the thirty minutes I was actually on, I was actually on. I had been able to accomplish what I thought would be impossible for me, and for those thirty transcendent moments, commercial breaks included, I was sharply aware and appreciative of everything going on around me and inside my head. It brought to mind the end of Camus’ The Stranger, when someone asks Meursault if his captivity is unbearable to him. Meursault’s response is that if one were to spend just one day alive, truly conscious and open to the world, it would provide one with enough memories to sustain them through a hundred years of incarceration. It is a rare occasion when we are not held prisoner by the past or the future, but my experience taught me that once in a while, it is a possibility. I’ll take “Life-Altering Moments” for $400, Alex.


Monday, January 31, 2011

Hell Freezes Over: Oscar Gets It Right?

That cold blast you're feeling right now may or may not be from the nastiest winter since Dennis Quaid strapped his skis on in The Day After Tomorrow. No, my friends, the chill from the west is coming from the fact that Hell may have frozen over; after looking down the list of this year's Oscar nominees, I did not disagree with a single one of them. Is it possible that the age of miracles has come, and that the days of awful Oscar winners from Cavalcade to Crash are now behind us? Another thought as the year wraps up: that 2010, which felt like the most depressingly 3-D/fart joke/prequel sequel/ooh it's from a comic book year as it was unfolding, may in retrospect turn out to have been one of the strongest years for American film in recent memory. I had at least some admiration and respect for all 10 of the Best Picture nominees; and how thrilled are my fellow auteurists and I that the Best Director roster includes Fincher, Aronofsky and David O. Russell (if not Christopher Nolan, which is my only major gripe). All of this, and Jean Luc "You Can't Spell Godard without 'G-d'" receiving the you'll be dead soon award? Sacre merde! It should be an interesting night.

Best Picture

I reiterate my statement from last year that the return to the tradition of 10 BP nominees instead of 5 is a most welcome one. From this list, there are some fairly easy eliminations. Toy Story 3 will win Best Animated, although in some respects it might have been the year's best overall (certainly in terms of volume of tears produced). Not enough people saw 127 Days and a Boyle film recently won, so it will not make the cut (I've been waiting to make that joke since it was nominated). The Fighter was wicked cliched, with some of the most boring fight scenes ever seen in a major motion picture. Kids was lovely and unusual, but perhaps a bit too granola chic. That brings us to Black Swan, Aronofsky's unholy wedding of Repulsion and The Red Shoes, which was probably my favorite film of the year; a bit too dark and intense for the majority of voters, I would guess. All in all, the best picture I saw last year was Winter's Bone, which was a miraculous combination of an incredibly vivid sense of a particular time and place mixed with a tale as ancient and universal as any tribal legend. Too small to win, but look out for all the talent involved. My guess is that in honor of its 30th anniversary, we will see a repeat of the Chariots of Fire syndrome. As in that case, a small, finely crafted film about Englishmen overcoming obstacles to achieve great triumph will upset a favored film about revolution (in 1981, it was the Bolshevik kind; in 2011, the digital kind). So King's Speech over Social Network in a squeaker.

Best Actor

Easiest pick on the board. The Dude and Bardem have won recently. Jesse Eisenberg was a welcome surprise, although he was forced into playing one note for a long, long movie. James Franco strikes me as the kind of actor who will pick up a couple of these awards along the way, an amazing combination of intelligence and old-school charisma. But this is not his time, and the award belongs to Colin Firth, who indeed deserves it and will most likely not stutter during his acceptance speech.

Best Actress

Another no-brainer. After all, anyone who could almost make the line "Why can't things be like they were back on Naboo?" seem believable surely deserves some kind of credit. In all seriousness, however, Black Swan was the moment where Natalie Portman finally fulfilled the potential we had seen small hints of (utterly charming in Garden State, powerful in V for Vendetta). The film's success or failure rested on her shoulders and she knocked it out of the park. Her only competition should be the brilliance of Jennifer Lawrence as an Antigone of the crystal meth Ozarks in Winter's Bone.

Best Supporting Actor

It's very tempting to hand this one to Geoffrey Rush for doing the one thing they said he could never do: underplay. He is marvelous as the failed actor turned speech therapist to the crown, but he's won already and I think voters will want to spread the wealth. Sorry to beat this drum again, but it would be more than just if John Hawkes were to win for underplaying to a very different effect in Winter's Bone. His Uncle Teardrop was one of the most chilling, terrifying characters put on film in recent memory, and all of it done with no visible technique at all (or even a funny haircut like Javier Bardem in No Country). This is not going to be the year of the underplayer in this category, however; the winner in a runaway will be Christian Bale's showy, dripping-with-technique yet never less than riveting performance as Dickie in The Fighter. I don't think it's his best, but I've never seen him give an uninteresting performance, in good films and wretched, going all the way back to his debut in Empire of the Sun nearly a quarter century ago.

Best Supporting Actress

Toughest call of the big ones. If you are one of my fellow fanatics who believes that Homicide: Life on the Street was the best show ever to grace network television, perhaps the biggest reason to celebrate this year's picks was the nomination of Melissa Leo in this category. She did win the Globes, and if she wins here, I'm the first to head down to Fells Point to celebrate. However, it is fair to say that she was matched scene for scene in The Fighter by a wonderfully cast-against-type Amy Adams; it is possible that these two performances will cancel each other out. The other good news in this category is that HBC finally came to her senses by getting the hell away from playing google-eyed loons for her husband. She is marvelous in King's Speech: regal, warm and always with a twinkling sense of humor underneath. In the end, however, I think that the Academy will give in to Anna Paquin Syndrome and give the award to Hailee Steinfeldt. She was indeed wonderful in True Grit, and should win it just for that one scene where she barters with the cotton broker. Hers was yet another stunning, out-of-nowhere performance by an actress this year, utterly convincing from start to finish.

Director

Here's a little quiz. What director has had the best three-consecutive-film streak since, say, 1990? Aronofsky? Fountain. (Lovely, but misguided). Tarantino? Maybe, especially if you love Jackie Brown as much as I do, but not everyone does. PT? Three words: punch drunk love. Actually, I think you could easily make the case for David Fincher for Se7en, The Game and the epochal Fight Club. Yes, Panic Room sucked, Zodiac was two so-so films for the price of one good one, and I actually prayed that time would run backwards so that I could have the three hours back that I spent watching Benjamin Button. All that said, I'm not unhappy that Fincher will win for a film that any average director could have made (especially with Aaron Sorkin on board); think of it as a Lifetime Achievement Award, and you'll sleep more easily. Of course I'll be rooting for Arnofsky's return to form in Black Swan, and hoping that The Fighter marks David O. Russell's path away from Huckabees and back in the general direction of the brilliance of Three Kings.

And So On...

Lots of tech awards for the brilliant Inception, if nothing else. Screenplay awards to King's Speech and The Social Network. Godard's silence in not showing up will be as profound as anything anyone actually says. And for goodness' sake, if they're not ready for Aronofsky to win, please let them recognize his cinematographer Matthew Libatique for his endlessly innovative and breathtaking work. As a final note, I would recommend Mark Harris' wonderful article in GQ about the potential impending death of American film. (The Day the Movies Died). Here's hoping that he's wrong, although as you look around at what's opening this coming year, early results aren't promising. If 2010 was any indication, however, there is great hope that the spinning top will indeed fall and that it won't be another bad dream.

Friday, February 19, 2010

"We'll Get Through This:" Chunk White's Annual Oscar Picks!

One way of approaching the history of film is to examine the struggles of the great directors against the limits of time and space. In fact, one can almost identify a director as an auteur based on the ways in which he or she has wrestled with this idea. One wonders then what someone like Andre Bazin would have made of Avatar. It's quite possible that James Cameron's film will signal the final triumph of the director over such limitations; with the technology at our disposal, it seems that now the only limits a director faces are those of his or her own imagination. Yet Avatar surely doesn't feel like a liberating yawp of freedom for film; many casual and serious filmgoers alike walked away from the film with quite the opposite feeling. We may look back on this year's Oscars as nothing less than a referendum on the direction that film will take in the future, and it seems like a good ol' Matrix/Terminator man vs. machine struggle between Avatar and more traditional works like Hurt Locker. It will be clear below where my sympathies lie, but we cannot avoid the question: is the "breakthrough" represented by Avatar the next step in film's evolution, or is it a passing fad that will play itself out in the wake of the countless imitations and sequels it will inevitably spawn? Are the next auteurs out there with cameras in their hands, or locked away in a cubicle somewhere writing software code?

Best Picture
Hollywood gave in to Dark Knight syndrome this year, and for the first time since Orson Welles was a pup and Hitchcock a recent emigre, we have ten films nominated for this award rather than the accustomed five. Based on the fact that some truly interesting genre pieces and smaller, thoughtful films made the cut, I must shout hooray! I love the idea that the DVD of A Serious Man can trumpet "Best Picture Nominee!" when it clearly would never have made the top five. And how about the same for the sneaky genre pyrotechnics of District 9? And Up joining Beauty and the Beast as the only animated films ever nominated for BP? That these three wildly different, brilliant and unforgettable films made the list validates the Academy's change, to my mind. They have no chance, but who cares? An Education was too small, Blind Side too hackneyed (even for the superannuated voters) and Push too bleak to make much of a stir. That leaves two outside shots and two obvious choices. After almost 20 years in the business, Tarantino is still too extreme for much of mainstream Hollywood, and for all of its moments of brilliance, Basterds was too inconsistent and talky. If Pulp Fiction couldn't win against the flatulent Forrest Gump, I don't think QT has much of a shot here. Up in the Air has a slightly better shot, but I defy those of you who saw it when it opened to recall more than a scene or two. Like Michael Clayton, it is quality product that was worth the price of admission, caused a bit of a stir, and will thence vanish into the ether like expired frequent flier miles. Which leaves the heavy hitters and, without being too dramatic, the clash of Dances with Smurfs (kudos to Trey and Matt from South Park for nailing that one right away) and Hurt Locker might be nothing less than a battle for the soul of American film. I have faith enough that Oscar voters will keep their rare hot streak alive and vote for Bigelow's work, which encompasses nearly all that a great film should be. Hopefully, the BP Oscar will be made of unobtainium this time around.

Best Actor

This one is clearly a two-horse race, and an interesting race at that. Out of the running are Morgan Freeman (weakish film, won too recently), Jeremy Renner (brilliant as the latest of Katheryn Bigelow's adrenaline junkies, but seemed more part of the ensemble than the star) and Colin Firth in a movie that was named A Single Man because that's who went to see it. This leaves us Clooney vs. Bridges. These two represent very different approaches to acting in Hollywood. Clooney is Cary Grant, a star; charming, intelligent, often rising above mediocre material and frequently making good material great. Up in the Air was a solid, entertaining film that got more attention than it deserved due to its fortuitously-timed take on the new-Depression era economic and social malaise. The film was a huge hit, and that may outweigh the fact that Clooney won Supporting fairly recently for the egregious Syriana (OK--how many of you have already forgotten that that one was ever made?). And then there's the Dude, who's more like Claude Rains, bringing subtlety and grace to every role, large or small, into which he inevitably disappears. From Last Picture Show and Fat City, through minor classics like Cutter's Way and Fisher King, to showier pieces like Lebowski, Bridges has been, beyond any doubt, our most underappreciated actor for going on four decades. I'm not certain enough people saw Crazy Heart to make this happen, but this may be the time for his Pacino/Scent of a Woman or Newman/Color of Money moment, i.e. a Lifetime Achievement Award. An interesting contest of generations and of styles, but I'm going with Bridges; first round of white russians are on me.

Best Actress
Five great performances, but as with Actor, it should boil down to a competition between two polar opposites in terms of backstories and styles. Meryl Streep probably should win for inhabiting Julia Child so well, but she's become such a national treasure that her performances are almost taken for granted. Carey Mulligan is this year's Ellen Page, a fresh, bracing performance out of nowhere; I'm not sure enough people saw An Education to put the newcomer over the top. Dame Helen, as a recent winner, is the least likely choice here. This leaves the diametrically opposed neophyte, Gabourey Sidibe from Precious and Hollywood stalwart Sandra Bullock for The Blind Side. Unlike the Actor race, however, I don't think this will be all that close. Sidibe's performance was powerful, but it's pretty clear that Mo'Nique will win Supporting and that voters will not be inclined to reward both performances. Sandra Bullock is a veteran whom everybody loves, and to pinch a Python line, her career has had more ups and downs than the Assyrian Empire. Blind Side is classic Hollywood hokum, and was hugely popular. All the stars are aligning, and I think the prize will be hers.

Best Supporting Actor
The easiest pick of the bunch, as much of a no-brainer as Javier Bardem was for No Country two years ago. The only mysteries are as follows: why does Stanley Tucci get nominated for the repellent Lovely Bones and not for nearly stealing Julia and Julia from La Streep? And how did Fred Melamed, as the titular Sy Abelman of A Serious Man, not get nominated? It's all academic, anyway, since it's Christoph in a Waltz, as the most charmingly evil "gnatzi" since Ralph Fiennes in Schindler's List. And she'll have the milk...

Best Supporting Actress
Again, an easy choice. The two babes from Up in the Air will cancel each other out; Penelope just won, and Maggie G's time will definitely come. But this year it's all about Mo'Nique, and her shocking, devastating, powerhouse, out-of-left field turn as the world's worst mom since Grendel's in Precious.

Best Director
What exactly does one do for an encore after crowning oneself King of the World? Pope? Emperor? Dark Lord of the Sith? Fans of what used to be called "movies" are hoping against hope that the voters will look past the box office, hand James Cameron a whole slew of technical awards (which he clearly deserves), and give this award to someone who made a movie rather than designing a clever theme-park ride. An obvious choice would be JC's ex, Katheryn Bigelow, who finally managed to do what has eluded many brilliant and mediocre filmmakers alike: make a definitive film about our misadventure in Iraq. Since Jason Reitman and Lee Daniels made films that succeeded based on performances and script, rather than interesting filmmaking, I think we can safely eliminate them. Which leaves the wildest of wild cards, a certain Mr. Tarantino. As much as I enjoyed Basterds, I still think it pales in comparison with QT's best work; then again, so did Departed when compared to the half-dozen or so other films for which Scorsese should have won the prize. Basterds is certainly the choice for the auteurists among the voters, being a film that no one but its director could possibly have made. Unfortunately, the voters have not taken too kindly to auteur directors over the years; I'm inclined to think that QT's Oscar career will mirror Scorsese's, and that he'll win somewhere far down the road for work that is more safe and conventional than what he's doing now. In the end, there is no doubt that Hurt Locker was the best-directed film of the year, in the sense that Bigelow used the "non-verbal" elements of film to help tell her story, establish the mood, and involve us with the characters. For that, she should win, unless the dollar signs of Avatar blind voters to the fact that beyond the sugar rush of the immersive technology, it is a very conventional and cliched piece.

And So On...
Toughest pick of the year: Best Animated Film, where Up and Fantastic Mr. Fox were equally deserving, Princess was a wonderfully old-school piece for Disney (though someone needs to tell Randy Newman that he's been writing the same three songs for the last forty years) and Coraline was creepy and wonderful (I'm going with Pixar). Haneke's White Ribbon for Foreign, with Un Prophete as an outside shot. Wallace and Gromit ride again for Animated Short! Adapted Screenplay for Precious; and while I'd give anything for the Coens to win Original Screenplay, I won't be disappointed if it goes to Tarantino for a screenplay that is, one must admit, highly Original. Which leaves Cameron with an armful of tech awards, much money and, if there's any justice, little else. Anyway, we've just had a Polanski and a Scorsese open in the same week, so there is light ahead...

Saturday, October 24, 2009

Now-Where Was I? The 20 Greatest Films of the '00's


In last week's New York Times, there was an article about what to name the decade that is about to come to a close (you know, like the "Me decade" 70's or the "go-go 80's"). Were we to practice a similar form of reductivist thinking on film in the past ten years, it might be accurate if a bit facile to call it something like the Decade of Disappointment. In America, this was felt in a particularly keen way; after a while, it seemed like all we were getting were CGI blockbusters or regressive comedies with either Will Ferrell or Seth Rogen. The 90's had ended with a rush of great films like Fight Club, Magnolia, Rushmore, The Matrix, Pi, Three Kings and others that heralded a generation of homegrown auteurs ready to take the place of the Scorsese/De Palma/Coppola generation. And this decade, those same directors have given us the occasional great film (There Will Be Blood, The Fantastic Mr. Fox), some passable moments (The Wrestler, Zodiac) and a whole pileful of disappointing garbage (Speed Racer? Benjamin Button? Darjeeling Limited? I Heart Huckabees?) Even QT, the greatest hope of the 90's, has wandered, becoming an uneven-yet-frequently-brilliant "problem director." And with the passing of the indie studios through closure (Picturehouse, Warners Independent) or co-opting (Miramax, New Line), the American indie movement that began with sex, lies and videotape and reached its apogee with Pulp Fiction is now as dead as Bill after Pai Mei's five point palm exploding heart technique.

And let's not forget that the decade brought the biggest technological paradigm shift in the history of cinema; anytime we use the word "film", it must now be with a sense of ironic nostalgia. Digital may signal the end of the very act of sitting in a dark room filled with strangers and experiencing the thrill of, in Pauline Kael's phrase, losing it at the movies. Digital may even signify that the new auteurs are huddled away writing software rather than out there shooting footage. These are debatable changes; having everything on demand is certainly desirable, and if digital fulfills its potential, then there will be no more physical restraint for film in terms of form or content. The only limits will be the imagination of the artist. One thing beyond debate, however, is that as of this point, the fact that the means of production are now universally accessible has not led to a creative revolution bubbling up from below. YouTube has given us plenty of cats in dryers, but nary a noteworthy new director. As is the case with music, we're left wondering whether the bad old days when the studios had absolute control as gatekeepers were really so bad.

So where does this all leave us? Is American film in eclipse, destined to be overtaken by such unlikely emerging rivals as Mexico, Romania and South Korea? And as the film school generation fades, will anyone take their place? Hard to say, but almost in spite of ourselves, we managed to produce some memorable work in the "aughts", as per the list below. Perhaps, in the end, we can refer to the '00's as the "Ellipsis Decade," a statement suspended midway, trailing off into silence, or perhaps resuming with something more powerful than that which preceded it...

20. Slumdog Millionaire (Danny Boyle, 2008). Living proof that once or twice a decade, Oscar actually gets it right. For the past 15 years, Boyle has always been the most slippery of auteurs; how could the director of Trainspotting made such varied and underappreciated genre pieces as Sunshine and Millions? Watching Slumdog, one had the sense that it was make or break for the director, and from the most unlikely roots, this triumph emerged. Yes, it is the greatest hits of Bollywood filtered through Western eyes, but it didn't feel like cultural appropriation or orientalist slumming. If the individual elements of the film were less than original, the combination of them surely felt so. Jai Ho!

19. A Mighty Wind (Christopher Guest, 2003). No one could make the argument that it's as funny as Best in Show or even Guffman, not to mention Tap. But Guest and his band of brilliant improvisers tap into something much bigger here in their imagining of a star-studded tribute to a recently deceased and beloved folk impresario. What we see is the slow, romantic death of the idealism of the 60's, embodied especially in Eugene Levy's burned out genius Mitch. When Mitch and his former partner and love, Mickey (Catherine O'Hara) kiss at the end of their song, all they and their generation had and lost are brought to bear. When Nigel rejoined the boys on stage at the end of Tap, we cheered. Our response here is something much more complex, sad and sweet. And yet somehow, the film never stops being funny. And so much more: pitch-perfect songs that are parodies yet somehow capture the essence of the various folk sub-movements of the 60's; Ed Begley as the world's most Jewish Scandinavian; the best song ever written about catheters; and the greatest catchphrase that never caught on: Wha' happened?

18. Rachel Getting Married (Jonathan Demme, 2008). To a boy from the outer boroughs moving to the East Village in the late 80's, Jonathan Demme's films of the period represented my fantasy of my new home: odd, edgy, bubbly, funky and awesomely, spectacularly multicultural, the same vibe one felt in his Stop Making Sense, still the best concert film ever made. Like Jeff Daniels in Something Wild and Michelle Pfeiffer in Married to the Mob, I entered an alternate downtown universe that was a little dangerous, more than a bit enticing and stirringly romantic. But times changed; the neighborhood gentrified, and so did Demme, as he became a glorified studio craftsman with Silence of the Lambs and Philadelphia. Beloved was a neglected masterpiece, but Demme hit a new creative low with his early 60's classic remakes phase. All by way of setting up what a blissful return to form we got in Rachel, even if the bubbling melting pot has been relocated to suburban Connecticut. Starting with the moment when we all realized that Anne Hathaway was an actress, the film serves up many similarly unexpected treats, not the least of which was the return of Debra Winger. Two moments stand out: Hathaway's justly celebrated wedding dinner toast, and Ethan's plate. Wait for it.

17. In the Mood for Love (Wong Kar-Wai, 2000). I hate to sound cranky, but what happened to our one-time domination of all things genre? How has it come to a point where the best noir and the best horror films of the decade came from South Korea? Is it true that all we're capable of making is Transformers vs. Iron Man 12: The Quickening? We used to own film romance; now we're reduced to sentimental tripe like The Notebook or the recent spate of vampires in love. You want old school romance? Check out Tony Leung and Maggie Cheung in this aching, beautiful and strange romance set in 1962 Hong Kong. Filled with all of Wong's usual brilliant visuals, what truly makes this work is the attention to detail and the restraint of the two leads. They slowly and inexorably fall for each other, even as they realize that their respective cheating spouses are cheating with each other. Will they choose the same path and give in to their attraction? Or will they resist, since giving in would make them as bad as those who have hurt them so badly? Not that it's giving too much away, but In the Mood for Love reminds us that all the great romances, from Romeo and Juliet to Casablanca, end with love unrequited. And that's the most romantic thing of all.

16. Children of Men (Alfonso Cuaron, 2005). Not surprisingly, this is not the only film of the so-called Mexican New Wave to end up on this list. In bringing us into a dystopian future where the human race is no longer able to reproduce, Cuaron avoids all the expected paths and presents us with the most unsettling and despairing vision of where we are headed this side of 12 Monkeys. Featuring yet another of Clive Owen's beautiful leading man/character actor roles, powerful support from Julianne Moore and Michael Caine and a most unlikely and reluctant heroine (Claire-Hope Ashitey's Kee), Children is believable precisely because it offers us no explanation of what happened or why. Instead, we are dropped in medias res into our bleakest nightmare, with only the slightest glimmer of hope at the end. The nearly-wordless scene where the main characters walk down the steps of a besieged building holding the miraculous newborn baby is one of the most powerful of the decade.

15. I'm Not There (Todd Haynes, 2007). The Oscars and American moviegoers were in love with movie biopics this decade, as Jamie Foxx and Reese Witherspoon will attest. (Dewey Cox, anyone?). In this deeply flawed but endlessly interesting piece, Haynes, who's never made a bad movie, explodes the idea of the biopic, picks up the shards and creates a funhouse mirror that functions instead as a biography of the idea of Bob Dylan. It does not always work, particularly in the grating section with Richard Gere as Zimmy in his Pat Garrett Americana phase. On first viewing, in fact, I found it more than a bit uneven and bordering precariously on the pretentious. But it stayed and stayed with me, and just would not let go. Further spins suggest that the innovative, frustrating form Haynes employs is the only possible way to approach this particular content. In the end, the subject is truly "not there", which, I'd guess, is the only way Dylan would have it.

14. Before Sunset (Richard Linklater, 2004). OK, OK, I take back everything I said about the death of the American romantic film. Sunset is unusual in many ways. It is the rare sequel that is as good as, if not better than, the original. For an American film, it takes an unusually grown-up and, dare I say, complex approach to love and to the bittersweet pain of truly entering adulthood. It is the rare film from one of the Austin crew that wasn't made for eight year olds (this means you, Robert Rodriguez, and your jars of testicles). And it marks the one piece of truly solid work in the second decade of Richard Linklater's erratic but never dull career, although there were certainly many good things about his other work of the decade. In Sunset, Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy reunite as the couple who passed a gloriously romantic 24 hours together in Vienna in 1995's Before Sunrise. That film ended with a promise to meet again in six months' time. As Sunset opens, we find out that he never showed, and they both moved on with their lives (sort of). Most of the film's 85 minutes is simply the two leads meandering through the streets of Paris, wandering in and out of the notion that the magic of that one youthful night so long ago can never return with the same intensity. Linklater's inevitably brilliant dialogue and his trust in his audience create a unique moment in American film.

13. Cache (Michael Haneke, 2005) I have yet to see Haneke's Palme d'Or winning White Ribbon, and I must admit that I've often found his films to be gratuitous, if witty, exercises in anti-bourgeois sadism. As I've noted elsewhere in these pages, the subject of Cache, just below its glossy Hitchcock-like, videotape-paranoid surface, is nothing less than the legacy of the Western subjugation of the Muslim world. A crucial plot point hinges on a historical reference to an infamous incident from the late 1950's, when a wave of Muslim protesters decrying the French presence in Algeria were set upon by the Surete; hundreds were killed and injured. As our upper middle class Parisian protagonists go about their evening routine, images and sounds of the Iraqi conflict come from the TV in the background. Cache never lets us forget that the scars of oppression never simply disappear when the oppression itself ends. When one of the characters, overwhelmed by the accumulated pain, commits suicide, it is one of the most effectively shocking and brutal moments in the history of film. All of this comes together in my favorite closing shot of the decade, which actually runs under the closing credits. It's a moment that suggests both the idea that we pass our sins on to our children in an endless cycle of violence and retaliation, as well as the possibility that our children may be the ones who will finally end the cycle.

12. A Serious Man (Joel and Ethan Coen, 2009). In many ways, this is the film that all the Coens' work over the last quarter century has been leading up to. For all of the complex shaggy dog plots, the brilliantly arch film-school camerawork and editing, the impeccably selected soundtracks and the unforgettable dialogue, there has always been a shiny, brittle and facile superficiality to their work. With the possible exception of Fargo, there never have been any real people in their films. Brilliant caricatures, yes, from H.I. and Ed all the way through Anton Chigurh. And just as the formula was starting to show some strain, with the unwatchable Burn After Reading, the Coens reach back into their suburban 60's Jewish childhoods to bring forth this darkly comic take on the Book of Job. In some ways, this is not a surprise; there has always been a small undercurrent of dark Jewish humor in their work, from John Turturro's Bernie in Miller's Crossing to Michael Lerner's studio head in Barton Fink, and most memorably in the"shomer shabbos" lunacy of Walter Sobchack in Lebowski. In A Serious Man, the Coens' fanatical attention to detail is put to use in the creation of a real world, riddled with extremely imperfect people wrestling with eternal issues of truth and guilt. In Lebowski, one small mistake leads to someone peeing on Dude's rug; in this film, one small mistake leads to what might very well be the end of the world. One can almost sum up the Coens' view of the universe with Larry Gopnik's line: no one can figure it out, but you're still responsible for it on the midterm.

11. Monsters, Inc. (Pixar Studios, 2001) No sensible fan of mainstream film could come up with a list such as this without including at least one film from Pixar. As the locus of real creativity has shifted from film to TV (can any film of the decade match the sustained excellence of shows like Lost, Mad Men, Sopranos, etc.?), the only sure bet in American film for the last 15 years has been on the geniuses at Pixar. In just about everything they've done, they have been able to make children's films that appeal to everyone, something that hasn't been seen consistently since the Chuck Jones heyday of Warner's cartoons. So the only question was, which to choose for the list? I would certainly argue that the first 45 minutes of Wall-E and the first half hour of Up are as beautiful as anything that has ever been put on film, and I'm not just talking animated film here. I tend to love the Pixar films where they create an entire universe out of whole cloth. So, with Wall-E as a close second, I'm going to go with Monsters, which drops us into a complete fantasy world that we believe in immediately. Hilarious, touching and completely pop-culture-reference free (take that, ogre), this is probably the most original film of the decade. And I still call my daughter "Boo" sometimes, even though she's 14 now...

10. Requiem for a Dream (Darren Aronofsky, 2000) It might be easy to argue that with the gorgeous mess that was The Fountain and the lovely but conventional Wrestler (which might be directly descended from that Wally Beery wrestling picture that Barton Fink could never quite finish), that Aronofsky, like many other late 90's auteur hopefuls like Fincher, David O. Russell, Wes Anderson and maybe even Tarantino, has not lived up to his early promise. These are arguments for another page; even if he had only directed Pi and this darkest of masterpieces, he would still be a major figure in American film. The old cliche is that a film has three parts: get your characters stuck up a tree, throw stuff at them, and then get them down. Unlike just about every other storyteller in the addiction subgenre, Aronofsky resolutely refuses us that third step, as his characters descend into an indescribable hell. Jared Leto and Jennifer Connolly are strong and believable, Marlon Wayans is a revelation, and who the hell was it who beat Ellen Burstyn for that Supporting Actress Oscar? Not to mention the Kronos Quartet's endlessly-appropriated music and Matthew Libatique's emergence as perhaps the best cinematographer of his generation. But the star here, from start to finish, is Aronofsky, and if he's wandered a bit since, repeated viewings of Requiem (if you can tolerate repeated viewings) leave no doubt about his potential to be the greatest American filmmaker of his generation.

9. Kill Bill, Vols. 1 and 2 (Quentin Tarantino, 2003-'04) Say what you want about his failure to live up to his early promise. Better yet, try to stay awake through the first half of Death Proof. The man is still the stickiest writer of his generation, and in many ways, these two films, taken as one, are his masterpiece. The House of Blue Leaves, of course, and the Superman monologue, the anime origins of O-Ren, the return of Sonny Chiba, Darryl Hannah and David Carradine, and my favorite: Beatrix digs herself out of her own grave as he recalls her cruel tutelage at the hands of Pai Mei. But perhaps what really puts this one over the top is the moment near the end when she breaks into Bill's hacienda ready to kill, only to find her cute daughter BB very much alive and well. Aside from Pam Grier and Robert Forster's performances in Jackie Brown, this may be the closest QT gets to real. And amazingly, Uma makes the moment real, convincing and even touching. In the end, it comes down to this; my wife, who cannot remember movie lines or song lyrics at all, was reciting whole scenes from the film after having seen it only once several years before. Like I said--sticky.

8. The 25th Hour (Spike Lee, 2003). The decade's most wonderful surprise as Spike, more than a decade removed from the films that made him the most celebrated African-American film director in history, began his understated reign as poet laureate of post-9/11 New York cinema. The ostensible topic of the the film is the last night of freedom for Monte (Edward Norton) before he begins a stretch in prison for a drug bust, and his quest to discover who it was who tipped off the cops. But the tragedy of the towers seeps through every pore of the film, most explicitly in the view of Ground Zero from the window of the apartment owned by Monte's best friend Frank (Barry Pepper), and in the palpable sorrow hanging over the bar owned by Monte's ex-firefighter dad (Brian Cox). All the performances shine, especially Pepper, Rosario Dawson as the girlfriend under suspicion, Cox, Anna Paquin and especially Norton's self-loathing Monte, a kid who was handed unbelievable opportunity only to piss it away. Two moments stand out in particular: Spike reprising the famous cursing litany from Do the Right Thing to very different effect here; and the beautiful, unexpected ending, which I think of every time I pass the George Washington Bridge...

7. Oldboy (Chan-Wook Park, 2004) Easily the best noir of the decade. In a genre that these days seems stale, too self-referential or both, Oldboy was a jolt to the system, a live octupus straight no chaser. From one of the most original setups in the history of the genre to the shocking and brutal ending, this is the rare film that refuses to let you be complacent and comfortable. That Park can pull this off while maintaining a sense of humor is even more remarkable. It doesn't feel like your granddaddy's noir, but when you get past all of the claw hammer violence and cephalopod appetizers, what remains is vintage: the story of a basically decent man who casually made a terrible mistake years ago, and is now forced to pay an inconceivably horrific price for his transgression. Not the least of the film's pleasures is that it finally opened Western eyes to a long-thriving South Korean film industry, and we're only now just beginning to realize that they do our genre films better than we do (see The Host, for example).

6. Mulholland Dr. (David Lynch, 2003). OK, so maybe this one is a bit of a tip-off to my age. I can tell you the date and the theater where I watched Lynch miraculously revive American film with Blue Velvet. And I know who killed Laura Palmer. I am a bit sentimental when it comes to film's favorite eagle scout, although not enough to get me through all of Inland Empire awake. But it seems, looking back, that with the exception of Blue Velvet, Mulholland is the best balance Lynch has ever achieved between his hilarious, deadpan solipsism and why-should-the-audience-care auteurism. All of the major Lynch themes are there, as are the visual motifs; these come together in the Club Silencio scene, one of the best he's ever shot. (And there's a Roy Orbison song again, this time en espanol). Even after all this time, no director has Lynch's ability to imbue the quotidian with such sinister beauty and mystery. The twist is that this time, Lynch's heroine makes her escape from Lumberton/Twin Peaks to the dream factory itself; in Lynch's hands, however, the dream can turn into nightmare in a flash behind the dumpster at Winkie's. Some still argue that there is no there there when it comes to Lynch. Well, perhaps no hay banda...and yet there is definitely music.

5. Almost Famous (Cameron Crowe, 2001) For the man who would be Billy Wilder, this was not the best of decades; Vanilla Sky and Elizabethtown were unmitigated failures. And when you think that Crowe was not living up to his early promise, you look at films like Singles, Jerry ("Show me the exit!") Maguire and even, yes, Say Anything, and wonder what the fuss was ever about in the first place. It's interesting, though, that the one time Crowe violated his master's dictum to never be explicitly autobiographical, he created a masterpiece. From the opening sequence, featuring the best fondling of album covers as though they were holy objects ever put on film, everything feels right and real. Billy Crudup, Jason Lee and especially Kate Hudson give the best performances of their careers, while old reliables like Phillip Seymour Hoffman and Frances Mc Dormand add to their respective galleries of brilliant character performances. Among the many highlights: the phone call between Crudup and Mc Dormand is priceless, as is the crashing airplane confessional of Sweetwater's drummer. Crudup's "I am a golden god" scene is followed by what for me is the single most beautiful scene in any film this decade, as the band and their entourage, frustrated, angry and annoyed with each other, sing along to "Tiny Dancer." In that moment, you can see them brush away all of the desire for fame, fortune and women and remember why they're there in the first place: the music. And when William says he has to get home, Hudson's Penny replies, "You are home." Yes we are, and for the only time in his career, Crowe hits a perfect note.

4. Letters from Iwo Jima (Clint Eastwood, 2006). The Man with No Name has made a fine living for all these years by quietly being a lot smarter and more gifted than anyone was willing to give him credit for. And so slowly, without anyone noticing until it happened, Eastwood has evolved from mannequin punchline to one of the greatest of all American filmmakers. Yet even his staunchest supporters were unprepared for the amazing burst of creativity that we've seen from him as he approaches 80; he has become the Philip Roth of American film. Not since John Huston's great run of late films have we seen anything like it. And as his more celebrated contemporaries like Scorsese, De Palma and Coppola have faded into inconsistency at best and mediocrity at worst, one might even argue that Eastwood was the greatest Hollywood filmmaker of the decade. But for all his brilliant films of the last few years, and a second Best Director Oscar for Million Dollar Baby, his greatest achievement may be Iwo Jima, his startling, understated and ultimately devastating take on that legendary battle from the Japanese point of view. Its companion film, Flags of Our Fathers, was underrated, and featured not only some unforgettable scenes (recreating the battle in Soldier Field as part of a war bonds drive, for example) but an unusually thoughtful meditation on the arbitrary nature of heroism. Iwo Jima, though, is the superior film. Boiled down, it is a study of how one must behave when faced with an absolutely hopeless cause, in a battle from which you will surely never return. In its own way, it is as powerful a statement as All Quiet on the Western Front, which also gave a face and a soul to a seemingly inscrutable enemy. No one else would have even attempted such an ambitious project; that Eastwood, at age 75, was able to bring home both films with such skill and grace is one of the great accomplishments in the history of American film.

3. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (Michel Gondry, 2004). If American film of the new century's first decade had a presiding spirit, I would argue that it resides in the work of the Spike Jonze-Michel Gondry-Charlie Kaufman nexus. Some of their films were more successful than others, but I would argue that even lesser works like Adaptation, The Science of Sleep, Be Kind Rewind, Synecdoche and Wild Things will grow in reputation and will be viewed for years to come. While each of these filmmakers has their own style and obsessions, there are common visual and thematic motifs that run through their work. These include gloriously complex, house-of-mirrors plots, a classic and pure sense of surrealism, and, especially in Gondry's work, a childlike sensibility that is touching and naive but never cloying. In short, these films are the locus of whatever is left of imagination in American cinema. And while all of them have their charms, there was only one where it all seemed to come together: Eternal Sunshine. To begin with, the movie features Jim Carrey's one great performance, the only time where he's not an annoying man-child or a sentimental sap. Kate Winslet's Clementine is one of the great characters in recent American cinema, and I believed every minute of their strange and beautiful relationship. Add in pitch perfect character turns by such stalwarts as Tom Wilkinson, Kirsten Dunst, Mark Ruffalo...hell, even Frodo isn't too bad. Then there's Kaufman's script, which for once tempers his dazzling intelligence, self-reflexiveness and multiple realities with people we actually care about instead of with cardboard cutouts. As with most of Kaufman's work, the film deals with people whose childlike sensibilities make it difficult for them to handle the real world and so, in a very retro-futurist DIY kind of way, they create or recreate their own realities. One of the many miracles of the film is that we don't even question for a second the plausibility of the idea of the good folks at Lacuna selectively removing memories. And perhaps the most romantic thing is Joel's realization that the pain of his memories is nothing compared to the pain of forgetting.

2. Pan's Labyrinth (Guillermo Del Toro, 2006) When my wife and I go to movies, we usually talk for hours afterwards about what we've just seen. When we walked out of this film, we were completely silent for a half an hour. At that point, the only thing I could say was, "That's why they invented movies in the first place." My daughter, tough city girl that she is, cried for a week after seeing it. What Del Toro achieves here is nothing less than the greatest example of magic realism in the history of cinema, perhaps along with Cocteau's Beauty and the Beast, which was clearly an influence. No film in my memory has ever created such a stark and intense contrast between brutal reality and (literally) escapist fantasy. The brilliance that Del Toro hinted at in Cronos and Devil's Backbone is fully realized here, although credit must be given to his collaborators. All of the actors, in both the real and the fantasy sequences, disappear completely into their roles; the set design is bleak, beautiful and original; and the music, especially that lullaby, will haunt forever. Much has been made of this film being a grown-up fairy tale, but I don't think that does it justice. Del Toro and his cast and crew are miraculously able to tap into the unconscious in a way that only the greatest stories can.

1. Memento (Christopher Nolan, 2000). This has been at the top of the list for nearly the entire decade, and nothing has been able to shake it from its perch. Along with Oldboy, it is the best neo-noir of the decade, but it is so much more than that. It is a gimmick film that miraculously, unlike all other gimmick films (this means you, M. Night) gets richer and richer with repeated viewings. And it is easily the greatest example in the decade of how form reflects content. In a film like Inarritu's 21 Grams, the unusual time structure ends up feeling trivial and arbitrary, and adds nothing to our appreciation of the characters or the story. And at first, Memento's story seems confusing for confusion's sake. But then the moment comes when it hits you that Nolan has found a way for us to get inside Leonard's head and actually experience the confusion that stems from his anterograde amnesia. And it goes even deeper. The memory thing, which seems like the cheapest of plot gimmicks lifted from a second-rate 40's B noir, becomes the basis for the greatest cinematic philosophical excursion into the nature of memory itself since Rashomon. Either intentionally or not, Nolan tapped into something very profound about our culture; it's no surprise that we've seen so many variations on the idea since, from the Adam Sandler/Drew Barrymore 50 First Dates to Dory in Pixar's Finding Nemo. And what does it say about us that #1 and #3 on this list feature either self-induced memory loss or deliberately misremembering something too painful to bear by repeating a lie often enough that, via conditioning, it becomes the truth? As for the film itself, what a blessing to have three great character actors in the leads, interesting and colorful players in the bit parts and a director whose fascination with these ideas of identity and self have played out so beautifully here, in Prestige and in the Batman films. If this was a decade that featured much that we'd all choose to forget if we could, Memento has to be its iconic film.

Saturday, February 02, 2008

Oh, I'm Calling It, Friendo: Fearless Oscar Picks, Round Three



In the two Best Picture-nominated arthouse smashes of the year, There Will Be Blood and No Country for Old Men, the most charismatic and interesting characters remain cyphers throughout their respective films. We sat through those two films, waiting for some explanation for the unblinking, Terminator-like focus of Daniel Plainview and Anton Chigurh; in both cases, thanks in no small part to Sinclair Lewis and Cormac Mc Carthy, respectively, answer came there none. (A small tip of the hat to PT and the Coens for not imposing a simplistic Psych 101 explanation, a la Charlie and the Chocolate Factory). In many ways, the entire year in film also seemed to be without a center or a simple explanation. It was a year of incredible performances, astonishing cinematography and memorable soundtracks, but I'm not really certain if there was a film like 06's Pan's Labyrinth or Letters from Iwo Jima that seems destined to become an indispensible, iconic film. This is reflected in the fact that while many of the other categories seem relatively easy to predict, Best Picture may be the toughest call in years.


Best Picture

My greatest fear here, of course, is that the same people loved No Country and Blood, and therefore might split their votes. Michael Clayton is a terribly overbaked nonfactor, centered around a ludicrous script that pivots on the notion that a fixer is shocked, shocked to find that the agribusiness concern his white shoe firm represents has knowingly poisoned some farmers with their pesticide. Where's Captain Renault when you need him? The film was even dumber than the moronic Syriana, which takes us three hours and several trips around the globe to tell us that the oil companies run everything! Atonement was that rare bird, an excellent adaptation of an excellent contemporary novel; sorry all you fans of The Shipping News, but this does not bode well for the film's chances. If you pin me down, Juno was probably my favorite film of the year, one which on the surface looked alarmingly like a Sundance Mad Lib but which was able to surprise at many turns. I think it will win elsewhere, but not here. There Will Be Blood was a difficult film structurally (Citizen Kane meets Chinatown meets Giant), and like Best Picture losers like Raging Bull or A Clockwork Orange, had a complete nightmare for a protagonist. Ultimately the award will go to No Country, which has a vision as dark as PT's film within a much more palatable and familiar structure. I'll venture to guess that my fellow Little Lebowski Urban Achievers (and proud we are of all of them) and I wouldn't consider it the Coens' best effort; for my money, it falls short of Fargo, certainly of Miller's Crossing, and even in some ways of the cartoon farces of Raising Arizona and, of course, Lebowski. What's the most you ever lost on an Oscar pool?


Best Actor

Maybe we should just hand the award to Clooney for almost making Michael Clayton bearable. Has he given a bad performance in the last decade? Remarkable, given some of the crap he's in (does anyone remember that Ocean's 13 was also this year?). But he just won Supporting for Syriana a couple of years ago, so it's not his turn. No one saw In the Valley of Elah, or for that matter any of the spate of the well-intentioned bludgeons masquerading as thoughtful Iraq films released in the fall. Tommy Lee will have to settle for dusting his Fugitive Oscar this year. Viggo has to win eventually, but I must say that I'm not as thrilled as many are with his partnership with David Cronenberg. Eastern Promises was inferior in all ways to A History of Violence, except in the number of brutal throat slashings the viewer had to endure. Speaking of which, why not Johnny Depp this year? Granted, I say that every year he's up for something, but how many actors could acquit themselves so well as both Jack Sparrow and the Demon Barber in the same year? Depp's Sweeney is a one note performance, but the character does not have much more than one note to begin with. Just the idea that Depp could handle Sondheim with some grace (unlike the poor, outmatched HBC, for whom acting has become a series of theme and variations on a creepy bug-eyed stare) and make us feel sympathy for a mass murderer should put him over the top. But it won't, of course; Daniel Day-Lewis will drink Johnny's milkshake, as it were. I'll never forget seeing A Room with a View and My Beautiful Laundrette within a few months of each other back in '86 and not realizing that the same actor was playing in both. I've been a fan for a long time, and it would be an understatement to call his performance in Blood magnetic. That being said, John Huston was twice as terrifying playing the same sort of role in Chinatown, with about one tenth of the screen time. I'm rooting for Depp, but I will not be surprised or displeased if Day-Lewis wins his second.


Best Actress

This is a weird one; each of the contenders this year has a compelling story behind her, and with the very notable exception of Ellen Page, each was in a film that about eight people saw. Let's begin then with Juno; no matter how you felt about the film, her connection with the character was uncanny. That might be a positive, or it might hurt her in the eyes of voters who thought she was simply playing herself. Let's not talk about theories of acting; suffice to say that her youth may work against her. Unless it's a sweep for the film, she'll have to wait. Julie Christie is in the opposite corner. In her favor are her long history in the business, the whole playing mentally ill thing, and how cool it would be to have her two Oscars separated by over 40 years. No one saw Away from Her, but this year, that might not have so much of an impact. Cate B has no chance; Elizabeth was awful, and she's won recently for Aviator (and might again this year for the Dylan thing). I would not be surprised if Laura Linney, an actress who has never given a bad performance in her career, wins. She's very popular, and the small box office won't hurt. That leaves the buzz that has been building for Marion Cotillard's performance as Piaf in La Vie en Rose. It's an intriguing performance in a good film, and playing musicians did not harm Jamie Foxx and Reese Witherspoon as of late. I think she'll take it in a close one, but the real question is this: why is there such a disconnect between great female performances and ticket sales?

Best Supporting Actor

As if there could be any doubt. Anton Chigurh is a screen villain legend on par with Hannibal Lecter, thanks to Javier Bardem's brilliant performance. Who else could have made a scene set in a West Texas gas station that involves no bloodshed or violence whatsoever the most frightening scene in recent film memory? In the end, Bardem does nothing less than embody the random, inexorable terror of fate itself. Against an unusually weak field, this is a gimme.

Best Supporting Actress

The early money was heavy on Cate Blanchett here, for her note-perfect incarnation of Don't Look Back-era Dylan in I'm Not Here. Upon closer examination, however, things get a tad more twisty. First, very few saw the Haynes film, in spite of all the Times Magazine cover hype. Second, many who did see it didn't like it. As mentioned, she's won recently. And finally, it seems as though an annual Cate Blanchett nomination is almost an Oscar formality, on par with the necrology montage. So who sneaks through the Blanchett backlash? Not the chick from Atonement, who should buy a consonant. Ruby Dee would be a wonderful story, of course, but if the sentamentalists didn't give the honor to 146-year old Gloria Stuart for Titanic, they surely will bypass Ruby for a much hyped film that everyone a year down the road will forget was ever made. Tilda Swinton is one of the great treasures among film actors, but her performance in Michael Clayton was one extremely shrill note. She was poorly served by her script, but that matters little. It's clear that Amy Ryan's explosive, brutal performance in Gone Baby Gone was one of the year's most riveting, and I think she'll walk away with it.

Best Director

Before I say anything, can someone PLEASE explain to me how Tony Gilroy was nominated for a film without a single interesting shot or edit, while Tim Burton, who created an ur-London of the mind for the flawed, brilliant Sweeney Todd got shut out? Juno was all about that script, those actors and that low-fi soundtrack; instead of nominating Reitman, they should have given the nod to whomever animated the opening credits. I don't think that Schnabel will win, but he should get credit for turning a completely unfilmable book into a completely original vision. And so, how do I choose between the Coens and PT? I'd be happy if either won, although I think that the brilliance of There Will Be Blood is so intimately tied to that one performance. It bears very little resemblance (except in focusing on the scarring legacy of fathers and sons) to PT's other work, and I think it's a film that nearly any good director could have handled. No Country, in spite of the debts owed to Bardem, the rest of the cast, Cormac Mc Carthy and Roger Deakins, is clearly a Coen Brothers film, one that only they could have made. Joel and Ethan in a photo finish.


And so on...

In spite of the technicalities of the nominations, we must pause in wonder that the next Ennio Morricone might be Radiohead's guitarist, and that the next new wave is coming from...Bucharest?? We cross our fingers that all the Iraq films will cancel each other out, paving the way for another Oscar for Michael Moore, for what was in many ways his best film. Or that in a moment of clarity, the voters will bypass the viciously overrated Ratatouille for the brilliant wonders of Persepolis. Or that Diablo Cody's acceptance speech will be as entertaining as it promises to be. Or that Be Kind Rewind will make us forget all about an up and down 2007. Si se puede!

Friday, April 06, 2007

By Popular Demand: 12 Great Overlooked American Films of the '80's


With the glory days of the American New Wave already a distant memory, and with power firmly in the hands of the Jerry Bruckheimers and Mike Ovitzes of the world, the 1980's was a grim decade with regard to creativity and originality in Hollywood, if not for the bottom line. The Star Wars-Jaws, big opening weekend or pull it, marketing-is-king mentality had a grip on the industry as strong as Darth Vader's mind-chokehold on an incompetent admiral. Not that the news was all bad, of course. The studios, often in spite of themselves, still managed to turn out classics like Blade Runner, Reds, Brazil, Who Framed Roger Rabbit?, The Right Stuff, Platoon, Blue Velvet and Do the Right Thing, as well as much outstanding work by the Spielberg-Scorsese-De Palma contingent. And in the films of directors like Jim Jarmusch and John Sayles, the seeds of the brief explosion of genuine Amerindie film that began in 1989 with sex, lies and videotape were planted.


In examining American film in the 1980's, therefore, we see a handful of masterpieces, some strong indie work and a whole lot of product. To be fair, that would describe most decades in Hollywood history; however, the scholck quotient of the 80's seems particularly high. Perhaps that perception will change as the decade recedes into history; in that spirit, I offer the following list of a dozen great films of the 80's that are worth another look.

12. Casualties of War (Brian de Palma, 1989) The decade was a wild ride for de Palma, featuring huge hits (The Untouchables), soon-to-be cult classics (Scarface, Blow Out), horrific failures (Bonfire of the Vanities) and the only movie I've ever walked out on in my life (Body Double). Overshadowed at the time of its release by Oliver Stone's films as well as by Full Metal Jacket, Casualties is only now getting its due as one of the great Vietnam films. Sean Penn and Michael J. Fox are the Barnes and Elias of this piece as they come to grips with the aftereffects of a My Lai-style incident.

11. Black Widow (Bob Rafelson, 1987) A most unexpected return to form by one of the early masters of the American New Wave, who at that point hadn't done anything noteworthy in a decade and a half. Debra Winger (why isn't she Meryl Streep today?) plays a work-obsessed FBI agent who comes to believe that a series of apparently unrelated deaths of middle-aged, wealthy men may in fact be connected by a mystery woman, played with her usual feline grace by 80's icon Teresa Russell. When they finally meet, the murders take a back seat to the unusual, complex relationship between these two women that transcends the standard cat-and-mouse games of similar fare. When the two leads kiss briefly and unexpectedly, it is one of the great moments in all of neo-noir.

10. Housekeeping (Bill Forsyth, 1987) Having created a memorable run of sweet, whimsical comedies with an edge in his native Scotland (Gregory's Girl, Local Hero and my fave obscure film of all time, Comfort and Joy), Forsyth's first American film was this adaptation of Marilynne Robinson's already-classic novel. It tells the tale of two young sisters, orphaned when their grandmother passes away, who are sent to live with their eccentric aunt, played with perfect believablity and restraint by Christine Lahti. And by the way, forget what I said about Debra Winger; why isn't Christine Lahti a star, instead of being forced onto the small screen as a poor man's Allison Janney? The story is a clear eyed, moving account of how the sisters begin to grow apart, as one becomes enchanted with the aunt's occasionally dangerous behavior and the other decides to take control of the situation and be the "grown-up." A brilliant central performance, and the exception that proves the rule about how great books don't make great films. The fact that there ended up being no room in Hollywood for Forsyth's unique and offbeat talent speaks volumes about the industry at that time.

9. Little Shop of Horrors (Frank Oz, 1986) The conventional wisdom is that the American musical film died with Grease, only to be revived nearly a quarter-century later by Moulin Rouge and the spate of musicals that have followed in the past five years. Little Shop puts the lie to this notion. It's actually an improvement on the wonderful Off-Broadway show, featuring strong leads by Rick Moranis and the sui generis Ellen Greene, and hilarious cameos by Steve Martin, Bill Murray, John Candy and many others. What's really crucial is that the show was written by the extraordinary team of Alan Mencken and Howard Ashman, and while the film was not really a hit, someone at Disney saw it and had the rare good sense to hire the pair in an effort to revive Disney's animated musical franchise, which had effectively died with Jungle Book. The two masterpieces that Mencken and Ashman produced before Ashman's untimely death, The Little Mermaid and Beauty and the Beast, suggest that the classic Hollywood musical never really died; it merely morphed into animated form until Baz Luhrman pulled it kicking and screaming into the pomo new millennium.

8. The Big Easy (Jim Mc Bride, 1987) Many have tried, but few have been able to capture the glorious sleaziness of New Orleans as well as 60's-experimental filmmaker turned one hit wonder Mc Bride does here. The story is a fairly conventional tale of of police corruption; what makes this film worthwhile are the two lead performances by Dennis Quaid and Ellen Barkin and the pitch perfect attention to detail that gives you a real sense of place. Quaid's recent resurgence as a character player confirms in my mind that he was always undervalued as an actor; Barkin, in those days at least, was proof that sexuality did not require classic beauty. Together, they have the most explosive chemistry seen in an American film since Body Heat. Add to the gumbo a soundtrack that reflects all of the city's musical and cultural diversity, and you have a ripping good film.

7. Bird (Clint Eastwood, 1988) It warms the heart that Forest Whitaker took home the Best Actor Oscar this year; he has been giving consistently offbeat, authentic performances for over two decades now, from Ridgemont High teen to Idi Amin. But Bird may be his high point; he accomplishes what no other film actor ever has, and that is giving real flesh and blood to a jazz legend. When Hollywood, that most American of industries, has tried to take on jazz, that most American of musical forms, the results have been atrocious: The Benny Goodman Story, The Gene Krupa Story, The Glenn Miller Story, Altman's Kansas City...well, you get the idea (and I didn't even mention Lady Sings the Blues). But in the hands of Whitaker and true jazz aficionado Clint Eastwood, Bird Lives, as they used to say. Slow and sad, but a remarkable achievement. If it's too dark, catch another overlooked 80's classic from France--Tavernier's 'Round Midnight, with tenor great Dexter Gordon essentially playing himself.

6. Tucker: The Man and His Dream (Francis Coppola, 1988) By the time this film was released, Coppola was well on his journey from top-rank auteur to third-rate vintner. But in some ways, Tucker was the most personal film he ever created, and it holds up remarkably well. The true story of automobile inventor Preston Tucker, a visionary genius with limited social skills and business sense, who was thwarted and ultimately ruined by the greed and short-sightedness of his industry, must have resonated deeply with the director. In addition, Coppola had just lost his 22-year-old son in a freak motorboat accident, and Tucker's boundless optimism in the film seems to reflect how Coppola felt about his son. The narrative arc is remarkable, made even more so by the fact that many of Tucker's craziest innovations are now standard equipment on today's cars. In the end, what makes this film worth your time are the two central performances. Now that Forest Whitaker has been recognized by the Academy, I have to believe that there is hope for our greatest actor never to win an Oscar, Jeff Bridges. This is one of his best, and yet it's Martin Landau, returning from out of nowhere, who steals the film as Abe, Tucker's partner. This led to Landau's rediscovery, his brilliant turn in Crimes and Misdemeanors, and ultimately, his Oscar for Ed Wood. When you see this film, though, you'll wonder again why The Dude has yet to win his.

5. Last Exit to Brooklyn (Uli Edel, 1988) Fans of Aronofsky's Requiem for a Dream, admittedly a hard film to love, will find much to admire in this other Brooklyn-based adaptation of a harrowing novel by Hubert Selby, Jr. With the notable exceptions of On the Waterfront and Salt of the Earth (which you must track down at all costs), films about labor strife in America have not generally turned out well. Last Exit is an exception, as the tortured story of a dockworkers' strike in Red Hook becomes the backdrop for an evocative canvas of sexual torment and confusion, prostitution and other family fare. Featuring a great, if brief, performance by Jerry Orbach, and what is perhaps the most tormented character portrayal of Jennifer Jason Leigh's career, which is saying a lot. The excellent score by Mark Knopfler adds to the strong sense of time and place; hardly a date film, but it is brutal, powerful and unforgettable.

4. Running on Empty (Sidney Lumet, 1988) In one of my first posts on the Mondo Complexo, I railed about the self-righteous blindness of the Boomers and about how the world they are leaving their children is looks more like a bad acid flashback than like incense and peppermints. Perhaps no film illustrates this point more effectively than this small, overlooked gem of a family story. Small screen stalwarts Judd Hirsch and Christine Lahti (there she is again) play a couple who, as members of a radical group in the '60's, blew up a napalm manufacturing facility, with fatal results. For the next fifteen years, they have lived on the run from the feds, picking up, moving quickly and establishing new identities when the law gets too close. It's a hard life for them, but much harder still on their two sons. The elder of the two, played by the doomed River Phoenix, begins to establish friendshps and even a budding romance in their latest town. Throughout, he is quietly heart-wrenching as a young man torn between these new ties and the knowledge that at any moment he might have to cut and run. Completely believable, and directed by Lumet with his usual quiet grace, this sad elegy for the exceeses of Boomer idealism is also an ironic reminder that had drugs not cut him down, Phoenix would have been the great film actor of his generation.

3. The Stepfather (Joseph Ruben, 1987) Speaking of small screen stalwarts, check out Lost's Terry O'Quinn as the title character in this minor masterpiece directed by Ruben, who also created such B-movie style classics of the era as True Believer and Sleeping with the Enemy. O'Quinn plays a fairly standard variation on the serial killer blueprint; he moves from town to town marrying single mothers, wiping his new family out with the nearest sharp object at hand when they inevitably fail to live up to his exacting standards of Brady Bunch perfection. To really appreciate this film, though, one must recall its historical context; 1987 was the heyday of Reagan-era "family values," of the kind most strongly espoused by rightie heros like Gamblers Anonymous poster boy William Bennett and oxycontin-freak Rush Limbaugh. The film sildes from horror cliche to sly sociopolitical satire as the stepfather takes this hypocritical concept of family values to its logical extreme. The best political horror film since George Romero set his zombies loose in a shopping mall in Dawn of the Dead.

2. The Unbearable Lightness of Being (Philip Kaufman, 1988) OK, OK, I know it's not Kundera, nor could it ever be. And perhaps it's hypocritical of me to chastise Barry Levinson and crew elsewhere in these pages for ruining The Natural while at the same time placing this adaptation so high on my list. Fans of the novel should overlook how wrong Daniel Day-Lewis is for the lead, and all the many other infidelities to the source novel and recognize this film for what it is: perhaps the best film ever made, in this country anyway, about the sexiness of politics and the politics of sex. Unbearable Lightness is the cinematic equivalent of What's Going On/Let's Get It On-era Marvin Gaye. The performances are universally great; Day-Lewis, though miscast, brings his usual intelligence to the lead; this was Juliette Binoche's first real introduction to American moviegoers, and she hasn't let us down once in the subsequent two decades. But it's Lena Olin and her bowler hat that provide one of the iconic images of joyful, unabashed carnality in all of 80's film. Director Kaufman, whose previous effort, The Right Stuff, is my favorite film of the decade and one of the great epics in all of American film, shines throughout. Particularly effective are the images of Day-Lewis and Binoche intercut with historical footage of Russian tanks rolling into Prague to quash the Spring uprising, and the sad, sweet, perfect ending.

1. Empire of the Sun (Steven Spielberg, 1987) It may seem odd to put a film by the most famous director of his era on a list of forgotten films. Recall, however, that this film came out in the middle of a really bad run for Spielberg, which, with the exception of the formulaic but wonderful Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, lasted a full decade, bookended by the successes of E.T. in 1982 and the double whammy of Jurassic Park and Schindler's List in 1993. This was the period of the awful second Indiana Jones film, the highly questionable "artistic success" of The Color Purple (there's a reason this film is hardly viewed anymore), of Always, his appalling remake of A Guy Named Joe, and the beyond-egregious Hook. Buried in the morass of what might only charitably be called a slump is Empire, a film that failed terribly at the box office but which many people, myself included, have come to view as the director's masterpiece. All of the basic Spielberg elements are here. For starters, there's the WWII setting; the film centers around the young, spoiled son of privileged British diplomats living it up in Shanghai on the eve of the Japanese invasion in 1940. Then, there is the theme of parental separation; the scene in which young Jim, played by Christian Bale in his first major role, is separated from his parents as the panic-stricken residents of the city fight for any means of escape is perhaps the greatest single scene ever filmed by Spielberg, and that's saying a lot for the man who's made his reputation on such spectacular set-pieces. Then, as in many Spielberg films, the boy latches on to an alternative parent figure, here in the form of Basie, the crooked American pilot POW played with unusual restraint by John Malkovich. The bulk of the film details life for Jim and Basie and the other POWs in the Japanese camp, but it's not the plot that's the grabber here. Although we see things unfold from the child's point of view, which is classic Spielberg, of course, this feels like no other film made by the director. In fact, it has an episodic, jumpy sort of feel that is more like a French New Wave film than anything else. Slowly and patiently, the film details Jim's increasing fascination with his captors and the allegiances and inevitable betrayals typical of life under such conditions. Spielberg constantly defies cliche as well as the hallmarks of his own style, nowhere more than in the conclusion, where Jim's reunion with his parents plays out very differently than we might have expected. Of course, the film had the misfortune to be released right around the same time as Bertolucci's similarly-titled The Last Emperor, which was also an historical epic set in the East at a time of great transition; that may explain its poor showing. But more than any film in Spielberg's vast and profitable back catalogue, Empire deserves another look. Many of Spielberg's so-called "grownup films" are wonderful, but Polanski's The Pianist demonstrated the relatively superficial reach of Schindler's List, in the same way that Flags of Our Fathers and Letters from Iwo Jima did the same for Saving Private Ryan. I've commented elsewhere how, in films like A.I., Minority Report and War of the Worlds, he has tried without success to bring an adult sensibility to the kiddie fare that made him famous. In the end I believe that it is only in Empire of the Sun that Spielberg fully realizes his goal of marrying a childlike approach to subject matter with a mature sense of storytelling and filmmaking. It is his masterpiece, and I believe that its reputation will ultimately reflect this.